|
Post by kittygobonkers on Dec 14, 2006 14:06:51 GMT
What we need is a good old debate on this board ;D
So police have ruled that Diana's death was indeed an accident. Well of course they have, lets be honest who has got enough power to stand up and say "she was killed and heres the proof"...come on everyone, isn't it obvious that the Royal Family are the equivalent to the Mafia??? Who in their right mind would pin blame on them and would live long enough to show the world the truth?!?!?
what does everyone else think?
|
|
|
Post by matt on Dec 14, 2006 19:06:54 GMT
Accident.
|
|
|
Post by fenris on Dec 14, 2006 19:55:42 GMT
My friends all know that I've got a keen interest in conspiracy theories, so most of them are surprised by my opinion about Diana's death. I believe - and always have done - that it was, quite simply, an accident.
These are the reasons why;
If you're going to kill someone, but want to make it look like an accident, you're not doing to use a car accident on a public, open road, because there are too many unknown variables. You're got no control over other vehicles on the road, potential eye-witnesses, etc. Plus there's the fact that even if you do successfully engineer a car crash, what guarantees are there that your intended victim will actually be killed? It's been established that if Diana had been wearing a seat beat, she would have survived.
Let's say, just for the sake of argument, that the Royal Family and the British Establishment did assassinate Diana. Just think about the unbelievably enormous risk they would be taking. If information about the plot ever got out, the public knowledge that the Royals and MI5 murdered the most famous and loved woman on the planet would undoubtedly bring down both institutions. So no - the risk would simply be too high. The Royals and the British Establishment would potentially lose more by trying to kill Diana than they would by simply letting her live.
The sad fact is that every day, thousands of people are killed or injured in traffic accidents all over the world. But because those involved aren't famous, nobody except their family and friends gives a damn.
|
|
|
Post by kittygobonkers on Dec 15, 2006 18:35:56 GMT
well....a brilliant example of debating there Some good points you made there fenris....i never normally watch all these programmes they have on tv about it but personally i think old Queenie had her bumped off for some deep dark reason muhahahahaha! maybe she was going to tell the world that Harry is in fact James Hewitts son (come on you would be an idiot if you hadn't noticed that they are the spitting image of one another!)
|
|
|
Post by matt on Dec 15, 2006 20:35:16 GMT
well....a brilliant example of debating there It's all it is. No debate necessary.
|
|
|
Post by kittygobonkers on Dec 18, 2006 11:08:21 GMT
well thats it then what an enjoyable debate i created there silly me to think we could have a lively thread....moving on eh?!
|
|
|
Post by fenris on Apr 7, 2008 17:57:09 GMT
So, after a public inquiry that lasted six months and cost an estimated £10 million of taxpayers' money, the verdict's in. And it was exactly what we already knew it was going to be;
Accident.
There was no murder. No assassination. No conspiracy. No switched blood samples. No white Fiat Uno full of MI5 agents in the tunnel, shining a bright light into the driver's eyes.
What an absolute waste of time and public money.
|
|
|
Post by DreamDangerously on Apr 8, 2008 18:23:37 GMT
I find it unbelievably ridiculous....what other outcome did they really think they were going to get? At the risk of sounding horribly callous, I couldn't care less at this point - I don't see any possible way to justify spending that amount of public funds on something that was more or less a foregone conclusion.
|
|
|
Post by fenris on May 14, 2011 17:15:45 GMT
The main cheerleader and ringmaster of the whole Diana conspiracy theory industry was always Mohamed Al-Fayed, whose playboy son Dodi was also killed in the crash. Apart from claiming that Diana and Dodi were assassinated by MI5 agents, with the kill order having personally been given by Prince Philip (!!!), Al-Fayed also insisted that they had gotten secretly engaged prior to their deaths, and Diana had been pregnant with his grandchild. Needless to say, the extremely expensive & lengthy public enquiry not only shot down all the assassination theories, but also proved that Diana had not been pregnant with anybody's child, plus several of her closest friends all testified that she'd regarded Dodi as nothing more than a short-term, summer fling, with marriage definitely not on the cards.
While the enquiry was ongoing, Al-Fayed publicly declared on several occasions that he would accept it's findings, no matter what they would be. It was widely predicted in the media that when the enquiry declared that the car crash was a simple, genuine accident (as everybody knew it was) that Al-Fayed would go back on his promise, claim that the entire enquiry had been a cover-up, and continue with the same old, repetitive ranting.
But after the enquiry published it's findings, to everyone's surprise Al-Fayed - to his credit - seemed to keep his word, and for the last three years has been noticeably silent on the subject.
However, Diana's death is currently back in the news, due to a documentary about the accident directed by comedian and actor Keith Allen, called Unlawful Killing, which is being screened at the Cannes Film Festival. And the main financial backer of the film? A certain Mr. Mohamed Al-Fayed.
Allen wrote a page-long article about his film in the Daily Mail last Thursday (12/05/11), in which he namedropped his famous popstar daughter Lily twice, for no apparent reason on either occasion. He also came across as something of an ego-maniac, stating that he's never had any problem getting any of his previous programmes commissioned by major UK broadcasters, but he was forced to accept private funding this time (thanks for the cheque, Mohamed), because all the UK networks turned him down flat. Allen seems to believe that this alone is proof that The Mysterious They don't want the subject of Diana's death receiving any new or revived publicity. Personally, I think the reason that the BBC, ITV, Sky, etc, all showed him the door is that they know all the theories have been flogged to death, totally discredited, and nobody really cares anymore. A further example in the article of Allen falling to keep his ego in check was his concluding declaration that he's so sure Diana died due to a conspiracy he's spend the last three years making his documentary, when he could have chosen instead to earn millions by starring in several Hollywood blockbuster movies (considering that Allen is only a relatively minor star in the UK and unknown overseas, I find it hard to believe that major studio directors are beating down his door) or that he could have simply signed up to continue playing the Sheriff of Nottingham (ignoring the fact that the BBC's Robin Hood was cancelled a couple of years ago, so he couldn't have taken that option even if he'd wanted to).
|
|