|
Post by Wight witch on Nov 21, 2005 10:18:56 GMT
But daddy's paying!!!!! Who am I to argue???!!!!
|
|
|
Post by krusty ketchup on Nov 21, 2005 10:19:58 GMT
oooooooh daddy this daddy that!
|
|
|
Post by auroradawn on Nov 22, 2005 17:42:54 GMT
I'm still undecided if I like the film or not, loved the ending it was SO sad, but i have to agree about Emma Watson eyebrows, but I did like her after the ball me and my friend were all awww for you. The twins were perfectly placed for some light humor.
But since i read the book certain little bits started to annoy me, for example since when have the other 2 schools been all boy/girl and seeing crouch jnr at the start and having him replace winky,
Was it just me or was it much scarier than you thought it would be, even after getting a 12A. I loved it being a 'scary' film but was still shocked at how much it was.
I will stop my rant for the moment.
But this is the best film so far, even if you do not like hp, the film is worth a look
Seen the film at a midnight showing on the Thur/Fri and still haven't decided so looks like i'm off to see it again
|
|
|
Post by Casazeal on Nov 22, 2005 20:30:16 GMT
What is annoying is that both Beauxbatons and Durmstrang are both boy/girl schools - making one all boys and one all girls is just silly! It makes it seem like Hogwarts is the only well rounded one lol And since when have the Patil twins been in two different Houses?! Parvati is in Gryffindor and Padma is in Ravenclaw - AND *yes there's more lol * Parvati always hangs about with Lavender. *finishes rant* But that's just a picky HP reader for you lol ;D
|
|
|
Post by Azazeal Lover on Nov 22, 2005 21:00:51 GMT
Saw the Movie at the weekend, was good. But they did change a few things and left stuff out, But i did like the film. Can't wait until the next One, even know it doesn't come out until june 2007.
|
|
|
Post by kittygobonkers on Nov 23, 2005 18:47:23 GMT
I'm ashamed to say i haven't even seen the third film yet so i'll have to watch that before i see the new one! I saw a clip of GOF the other day and it looks brilliant!
|
|
|
Post by Jimjamz on Nov 23, 2005 20:53:24 GMT
Really, you can skip the third film. I'd advise it.
|
|
|
Post by Casazeal on Nov 24, 2005 0:16:28 GMT
Really, you can skip the third film. I'd advise it. Amen to that!
|
|
|
Post by kittygobonkers on Nov 24, 2005 16:18:31 GMT
oh...i take it that the third is a bit poo then lol
|
|
|
Post by Casazeal on Nov 24, 2005 17:52:14 GMT
It just...cuts out so much and a lot of it is part of the book, which most readers like - and I for one, was looking forward to the return of Sean Biggerstaff, who played Oliver Wood. Since they cut out his character and the entire Quidditch Cup I was really disappointed.
|
|
|
Post by Wight witch on Nov 25, 2005 15:27:01 GMT
I have to say I thought the movie was EXCELLENT!!!!!!! So very good...
...but I was really annoyed at the lack of certain parts!! I mean where was all the cool mazy stuff, & Dobby/Winky & the rest of the match at the cup oh & where was Ludo Bagman!!!
|
|
|
Post by Jimjamz on Nov 25, 2005 17:48:20 GMT
Oooh yay, someone else is bothered about the lack of Ludo! No-one else seems to really care, I was looking forward to seeing him.
|
|
|
Post by kittygobonkers on Nov 25, 2005 18:05:57 GMT
I watched Prisoner of Azkaban last night and i quite enjoyed it hehe i loved Buckbeak, but it was so long ago since i read the book i wasn't sure how much of it they cut out! I suppose if they included everything that was in the books in the film we would be in the cinema for five hours I'm now ploughing my way through Goblet of Fire before i see the movie!
|
|
|
Post by Wight witch on Nov 26, 2005 11:01:30 GMT
I just think we have to seperate the books from the films. Because they're both good in there own rights (well now they've learnt how to act)!!!
Btw I was looking forward to seeing Ludo I thought he'd be really funny!!! I wonder who would have played him?!
|
|
|
Post by krusty ketchup on Nov 28, 2005 17:55:47 GMT
I've just seen it. Woooooooo!!! I have a few rants
1) Neville gave Harry the gillyweed, not Dobby!Grrr 2) They didn't show a thing about Hermione's house elf group 3) They didn't make a big deal about the trial and Karkaroff mentioning the Longbottom's. Harry didn't pick up on it so it didn't explain why Neville had such a hard job in Moody's lesson and the unforgivable curses! 4) They didn't make a big enough deal of the death eaters at the end with Goyle and Crabbe and others, only Lucius Malfoy! 5) Rita Skeeter was never found out as being an animagus (bug) at the end which is how she got all her stories. 6) Nothing was mentioned about Madame Maxine and her half giantessness (in a word). 7) The bestest part of the book wasn't included. When Harry is running away from Snape/ Filch (been a long time since I've read it) and he gets stuck in the stairs with the Marauders Map and Moody can see him!! 8) We didn't see enough of the Quidditch world cup! 9) We didn' see Winky at the world cup or in the school so they missed out the working out of the fact that Barty Crouch under an invisibility cloak was in the box not Mr. Crouch and that Winky set off the dark mark but it was barty crouch after all
Anyway all in all it was a good adaptation of half the book (okay sorry below the belt)
That's me done......for now!!!
|
|